Another difference
RE: My post "The difference," and the criticism thereof.
I spoke of nursing babies in public, and was taken to task by someone who doesn't seem to know the difference between "can" and "should." Nobody would restrict a woman's right to breast-feed. She "can" do so with impunity, but to do so in public, "should" only be in an emergency.
When a woman undertakes to nurse a baby, she has created a whole new set of behaviors. Nursing is a special intimate bond which is best fulfilled in a private setting. Responsibility dictates that every effort "should" be made to honor that privacy, and visiting must be limited to times between feedings. After all, nursing is not a life-long activity, and isn't the baby deserving of that short period of consideration?
3 Comments:
The baby does not care. But I think I see the way it works. You think she shouldnt. Therefore she shouldnt. You dont need any actual arguments or reasons.
Also "times between feedings"?
Not every mother feeds on a timetable. If she uses a feed when hungry system, then in your world, she should not ever leave the house.
Is that "baby [that] does not care" similar to one that has been aborted?
Apostrophes?
Post a Comment
<< Home