Dolce far niente

"Too much law make people mad." "Hawai'i"

Monday, September 22, 2008

P C Two

Pursuant to the California Supreme Court legalizing gay marriage, the license forms were reprinted to identify the participants as Party A and Party B, thus eliminating the Bride and Groom designations. Of course, they could have retained both forms, and that would be sensible, but not politically correct. One traditional couple has already refused to be designated A and B, and their altered form was rejected by their county clerk. Fortunately, they were still able to marry, because the bride's father is a minister, and they were wed in his church, the only place nuptials should be celebrated, anyway.

This gives us the opportunity to ponder the following short drama:

[Two persons contemplating marriage are confronted with the new form.]

Person 1: Which of us is Party A?

Person 2: I think I should be Party A.

Person 1: You always think you're Party A.

Person 2: Do you want to be Party A?

Person 1: I don't care. If you want to be Party A, go ahead.

Person 2: You just want to start an argument, don't you?

Person 1: No, I told you to be Party A, if you want.

Person 2: Sure, and then you'll bitch about it all the way home.

Person 1: Well, you won't have to hear it, because I'm leaving now.

[A door slams.]

8 Comments:

At 6:56 PM, Blogger Donalbain said...

Really? Marriage should only be celebrated in a church? So, Hindus should not be able to enter into the legal state of marriage?

 
At 11:31 AM, Blogger Don, American Idle said...

Churches. . . and OTHER RECOGNIZED RELIGIOUS HOUSES OF WORSHIP. You know what I meant.

 
At 7:27 AM, Blogger Donalbain said...

So, only religious people should be able to enter into the legal state of marriage? Blimey.. thats a bit harsh..

 
At 10:57 AM, Blogger Don, American Idle said...

Marriage isn't a legal state; it's a religious state. Why did we let the government get involved?

 
At 12:10 PM, Blogger Donalbain said...

Errr... it is a legal state. That is why the law gives different status to different relationships depending on wether they are married ones or not. It always has done. Marriage predates any religion that exists today.

 
At 5:29 PM, Blogger Don, American Idle said...

"Always been done" doesn't make it right.

 
At 1:54 AM, Blogger Donalbain said...

So, are you saying that the state should not give ANY status to married relationships? No tax differences? No legal next of kin rights? No legal inheritance rights?

 
At 5:42 PM, Blogger Don, American Idle said...

Exactly! You got it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home